Skip to content

Conversation

@titan73
Copy link
Contributor

@titan73 titan73 commented Dec 21, 2024

For #6406.

This is similar to what is done for odb but in a generic way that can be reused.
The new messages_multi cmake function can probably be merged in the messages one.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@titan73 titan73 changed the title DRAFT: cts: Fix messages check. cts: Fix messages check. Dec 21, 2024
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This appears to copy the messages function just to add a new DEPENDS argument. Could you just make take an option on the current one and handle if it is empty?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resent PR which extends messages function, convert odb and fix cts. Updated PR title. Thanks.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@titan73 titan73 reopened this Jan 2, 2025
@titan73 titan73 changed the title cts: Fix messages check. msg: Add support for extra dependencies to messages function, convert odb to it and add extra dep to cts Jan 2, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2025

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

@titan73
Copy link
Contributor Author

titan73 commented Jan 3, 2025

I created another PR #6468 as I accidentally trashed my branch and couldn't push a typo fix.

@titan73 titan73 closed this Jan 3, 2025
@titan73 titan73 deleted the msg_multi_deps branch February 5, 2025 20:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants